01 · The gap
Where the two sources disagree, and why
click a row for the source noteDirection is not a quality signal. A bridge gap usually means the IFRS figure is consolidated and the IF.Data figure is not, or that a subsidiary is carried at equity rather than proportionally.
02 · Line by line
All twenty-six reconciled items
R$ bn · latest reported period| Institution | Line | IFRS | IF.Data | Δ | Δ % | Source note |
|---|
What this bridge is, and what it is not
- Two populations
- IF.Data is the prudential reporting set. The reported IFRS figures come from each bank’s own statements. They answer different questions and are not expected to tie.
- Consolidation
- Where a bank consolidates an insurance or payments subsidiary, assets arrive in IFRS that IF.Data either excludes or treats differently. That single effect explains the largest gaps here.
- Materiality
- Gaps below 0.05% are shown but counted as exact ties. A tie is not a validation of either source.
- Vintage
- IFRS figures are as filed for the reference period. IF.Data may be revised later without a restatement flag.
26 items · 10 institutions · line names follow each bank’s own statements, so “Total credit” does not always mean the same perimeter twice.